On 9/15/2026 7:14 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
On 09/11/26 at 06:29pm, Ridong Chen wrote:From: Ridong Chen <[email protected]>...snip...--- include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++ 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h index 8a872990b4be..5defa8f6719c 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h @@ -392,6 +392,69 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES)) );+TRACE_EVENT(mm_mglru_scan_folios,+ + TP_PROTO(struct lruvec *lruvec, + int highest_zoneidx, + int order, + unsigned long nr_requested, + unsigned long nr_scanned, + unsigned long nr_sorted, + unsigned long nr_skipped, + unsigned long nr_taken, + int lru, + unsigned long max_seq, + int tier, + unsigned long min_seq),
Thank you for your review.
Do we need show nid? Guess phone vendor doesn't care about multi-NUMA system.
Eh, nid is not an mglru-specific key. Since there are 12 elements here, it can't be added here.
And I checked v1 thread, seems Steven suggested to move the two int to avoid extra padding.
Yeah, I will update it. I updated v2 to fix Sashiko's issue, before Steven had any comment.
+ + TP_ARGS(lruvec, highest_zoneidx, order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, + nr_sorted, nr_skipped, nr_taken, lru, max_seq, tier, min_seq), + + TP_STRUCT__entry( + __field(u64, memcg_id) + __field(int, highest_zoneidx) + __field(int, order) + __field(unsigned long, nr_requested) + __field(unsigned long, nr_scanned) + __field(unsigned long, nr_sorted) + __field(unsigned long, nr_skipped) + __field(unsigned long, nr_taken) + __field(int, lru) + __field(unsigned long, max_seq) + __field(int, tier) + __field(unsigned long, min_seq) + ), + + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->memcg_id = mem_cgroup_id(lruvec_memcg(lruvec)); + __entry->highest_zoneidx = highest_zoneidx; + __entry->order = order; + __entry->nr_requested = nr_requested; + __entry->nr_scanned = nr_scanned; + __entry->nr_sorted = nr_sorted; + __entry->nr_skipped = nr_skipped; + __entry->nr_taken = nr_taken; + __entry->lru = lru; + __entry->max_seq = max_seq; + __entry->tier = tier; + __entry->min_seq = min_seq; + ), + + TP_printk("memcg_id=%llu classzone=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_sorted=%lu nr_skipped=%lu nr_taken=%lu lru=%s max_seq=%lu tier=%d min_seq=%lu", + __entry->memcg_id, + __entry->highest_zoneidx, + __entry->order, + __entry->nr_requested, + __entry->nr_scanned, + __entry->nr_sorted, + __entry->nr_skipped, + __entry->nr_taken, + __print_symbolic(__entry->lru, LRU_NAMES), + __entry->max_seq, + __entry->tier, + __entry->min_seq) +); + TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_write_folio,TP_PROTO(struct folio *folio),diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 2554a6513aa8..67f59aa73fb9 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4876,6 +4876,12 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec, trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate(sc->reclaim_idx, sc->order, nr_to_scan, scanned, skipped, isolated, type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON); + trace_mm_mglru_scan_folios(lruvec, + sc->reclaim_idx, sc->order, nr_to_scan, + scanned, sorted, skipped, isolated, + type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, + lrugen->max_seq, tier, + lrugen->min_seq[type]);And seems Steven also suggested to calculate lru, max_seq, min_seq in TP_fast_assign() in v1 which could be missed.
Thanks, I will update it following Steven's suggestions.
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->memcg_id = mem_cgroup_id(lruvec_memcg(lruvec));
__entry->highest_zoneidx = sc->reclaim_idx;
__entry->order = sc->order;
__entry->nr_requested = nr_requested;
__entry->nr_scanned = nr_scanned;
__entry->nr_sorted = nr_sorted;
__entry->nr_skipped = nr_skipped;
__entry->nr_taken = nr_taken;
__entry->lru = type ? LRU_INACTIVE_FILE : LRU_INACTIVE_ANON;
__entry->max_seq = lrugen->max_seq;
__entry->tier = tier;
__entry->min_seq = lrugen->min_seq;
),
However, 'sc' is an internal structure, so sc->order cannot be accessed in TP_fast_assign(), and I don't think it is worth making scan_control an external structure just for this.
*isolatedp = isolated;return scanned; -- 2.34.1
-- Best regards Ridong
