On 23/09/2026 1:25 pm, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > Hi Muhammad, > >> I've the patches here [3] for arm64 conversion which I used to find >> usages in generic code which I missed during development. These would be >> sent separately. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] >> [3] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-us/-/commits/pte0_arm > > I checked [3] with s390 and also against our lazy mmu implementation and it > looks okay. > > However, is there a particular reason this series is against mm-new? > Should it be against the master, it would be easier for me to try it in our > CI.
I think, mm-new is the branch in which this series would be picked up. This is why its based on that. Are you referring to mm/master? -- Thanks, Usama
