Matthew Dharm wrote: > Rob -- > > Are you sure this is the right patch file? It doesn't look like it > implements the changes you describe... > > Matt For sure... Unless what's in CVS isn't in kernel 2.4.2. This is a patch against the previous version of what's in CVS. It looks funny when it's quoted because of the way the mailer broke the lines, but it looked OK when I sent it. Should I attach the patch files rather than include them in the message? --Rob _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 root
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch
- RE: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 root
- RE: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 William Robison
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Matthew Dharm
- [linux-usb-devel] HP8230 patch in CVS Robert Baruch
- [linux-usb-devel] HP8230 patch in CVS Robert Baruch
- RE: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 William Robison
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09 Robert Baruch