On Tue, Apr 03, 2001, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks (from http://lwn.net/2001/features/KernelSummit/annotated.jpg)
> > like Greg KH and JE were the USB influence at the 2.5 summit. So I 
> > assume that some "USB in 2.5" was discussed - at least off line.
> > So where is Linux USB going guys?
> 
> My tree is keeping dev_t and the standard behaviour even if Linus goes off 
> and does something different. As well as yes, replacing no. I think losing 
> dev_t is actually sufficiently bad breakage (eg breaks tar) that it can't be
> done.

Not like they actually mean anything anyway. They get recreated
automatically and they really only mean anything on that host.

JE


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to