Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB 2.5 directions

[Tim Jansen]

On Friday 06 April 2001 17:15, you wrote:
> - Update usbdevfs.  Files should be "per-interface", not "per-device",
>   to provide a model that's more consistent with PCI ("per-function").
>   Names should be "stable" and based on topology. 

Instead of making another USB-specific file system, why don't you try to make 
a generic device tree for all busses? I may be biased because I work on 
devreg, but I doubt that it makes sense to have dozens of device trees in 
different formats.

bye...

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel