Stelian Pop wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:30:02PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
> > On a Sitecom device this is a possible scenario. I only have an
> > "original" MCT U-232 and there I have seen the Win98 baudrate settings
> > with SniffUSB. Furthermore I tested it with a null-modem cable to
> > my PC running minicom/zmodem transfers and the throughput increased
> > with the baudrate.
>
> When using minicom this is equivalent to using a fixed baudrate device,
> so even being able to send some characters from one PC to the other
> means that the baudrate is correct.
>
> > > BTW: Did you see my other patch concerning the maximum packet
> > > size for the output endpoint of this same device ?
> >
> > Yes I have realized it. I have the impression that your device
> > is not equivalent to mine.
>
> Very possible. But with the two modifications I made the device
> seems to work very reliably (made a PPP connection over the null
> modem cable and used it for over 6 hours, transfering tens of
> megabytes, etc).
It is actually Cornel Ciocirlan (see CC) who has contributed the
initial Sitecom patch. Would be interesting to hear his opinion.
Just by looking to the Sitecom drivers INF files it seems there
are two different MCT like devices:
- USB2SER version 2.3a (USB2SER2.3a.zip)
- Windows 2000 driver USB to Serial with Intel chipset(intel_win2000.zip)(with USB
uplink port)
- Windows 98/ME/2000 driver USB to Serial with Philips
chipset(Philips98ME2000.zip)(without USB port)
The first two are for 0711:0210 and the third for 0711:0230.
-- Wolfgang.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
