On 16 May 2001 20:28:18 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > I certainly did not mean to imply that it is bad; I only was trying to say, if
> > the time comes that for whatever reason one of the UHCI drivers goes away, I
> > recommend the one that's easier to follow, because more people will be able to
> > understand exactly what it's doing.
>
> Or maybe the one that manages to share the most code with the
> other HC Drivers? That's a related maintainability issue.
How's that HCD code compartmentalization project coming anyhow? Is
everyone thinking of waiting until the 2.5 tree opens up before going
further with this? Personally, I think the HCD code-sharing project
should show up
fully in both the 2.4 and 2.5 trees. IIRC, some of this work was tied
to EHCI work, which is on hold for 2.5, correct? If so, could the
code-sharing work be split off from the EHCI work so that it could show
up earlier in the 2.4 tree?
Follow up question: Are the uhci and usb-uhci drivers making any
headway in taking advantage of any of the code-sharing work, thus far?
Thanks,
Miles
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
