Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 00:03 schrieben Sie: > Actually, looking at this.... does the devrequest structure need to be > allocated in DMA-able memory? Could I get away with it being on the stack? > > Yes, I know that stack-allocated memory is DMA-able _now_, but it won't be > in the future. I already violate that rule in several key places, but I'd > like to be moving in the correct direction on this... I am not sure that the stack is necessaryly DMA-able on all architectures. How about a 64bit machine with more than 4GB of RAM ? Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swappi... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell