Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 23:37 schrieb Alan Cox:
> > Additional remark: You should use GFP_BUFFER, not ATOMIC.
> > And yes, you'd need such a flag. Provided the scsi layer passes the
> > information. AFAIK it doesn't.
>
> The scsi layer always assumes I/O might be involved in page outs.
May we conclude that usb storage should use such a flag when talking to disks
as opposed to optical storage, etc. ?
Regards
Oliver
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swappi... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
