Am Sonntag, 16. September 2001 23:37 schrieb Alan Cox: > > Additional remark: You should use GFP_BUFFER, not ATOMIC. > > And yes, you'd need such a flag. Provided the scsi layer passes the > > information. AFAIK it doesn't. > > The scsi layer always assumes I/O might be involved in page outs. May we conclude that usb storage should use such a flag when talking to disks as opposed to optical storage, etc. ? Regards Oliver _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
- [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable for swappi... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Matthew Dharm
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitab... Oliver Neukum
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb-storage not suitable f... David Brownell