On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > IMHO, since the only safe thing to do across all architectures is to > > kmalloc the devrequest structure, anything other than that is essentially > > micro optimization that's not worth it. > > On the other hand it makes using that function in the block IO path safe. > Thus, if there's really no risk in terms of dma in 2.4, I'd consider it for 2.4.
Er, but don't forget that people will be using 2.4 and adding in their non-pci and whatnot USB controllers to 2.4 for a while yet. So perhaps we shouldn't do anything to 2.4 and backport what 2.5 has when it's stable. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
