On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:51:21PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > Right. And that's 2.5 fodder that can be backported, yes? > > > > > > Only at the cost of breaking all external drivers. > > > > ...which will when the time comes have to cope with 2.5 and 2.4 being > > different regardless. This happend (generically) in 2.2 a few times to > > make backporting easier, yes? > > So you don't think that going for a lot of GFP_ATOMIC is the way to go ?
Actually, I don't know. My main concern was that we don't go and break things like ARM and PPC 8xx USB which work outside the kernel and aren't in the slightest like x86, but can be made to work now. I was just making sure no one forgot about 'em :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
