On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:36:49PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 05:37:01PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > I'd say to switch them in hcd.c, as the manufacturer of the USB card > > > shows up in the Product line with the hcd code, > > > > PCI actually stores "manufacturer plus product name", and if > > you configure the kernel without PCI names (or don't have a > > name for that vendor/product) it'll be a cryptic pair of numbers. > > > > That wouldn't make much sense as a manufacturer name, but > > folk will be somewhat familiar with that pair of numbers from > > PCI showing it on the same system. > > > > > > > which might confuse people (it confused me :) > > > > Once everything uses the HCD framework, the answer will > > be consistent (whatever it is) and there won't be confusion. > > But as I said, it's easily switched if it seems important. > > Ok, I'm open to other people's views about this. What does everyone > else think? > > Personally, I think it makes usbview and other /proc/bus/usb/devices > based tools look a little strange.
I think the Vendor=kernel, Product=PCI IDs version is more reasonable. Or, we could just forget the PCI data, which is available elsewhere and do: Vendor = Linux kernel x.y.z Product = ohci-hcd .... whatever Version = X.Y -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
