> > For your case (c/b URBs queued to one endpoint) I think it must be.
> > After all, it's a queue ... queue jumpers not permitted!  :)
> 
> Right, that's exactly the point. Do I understand you correctly, you are
> saying USB_QUEUE_BULK does not only deal with urbs being queued to the
> schedule (in submission order, of course), but the _same_ queueing is used
> for the corresponding completion callback? Would be very nice to know for
> sure. This would be a valuable feature IMHO.

Yes, I think it's what the bulk (or, for anything except the UHCIs, control)
queueing behavior is intended to do.  If any host controller driver acts
otherwise, I'd call it a bug.

- Dave




_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to