On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, David Brownell wrote: > > saying USB_QUEUE_BULK does not only deal with urbs being queued to the > > schedule (in submission order, of course), but the _same_ queueing is used > > for the corresponding completion callback? Would be very nice to know for > > sure. This would be a valuable feature IMHO. > > Yes, I think it's what the bulk (or, for anything except the UHCIs, control) > queueing behavior is intended to do. If any host controller driver acts > otherwise, I'd call it a bug.
Ok, Thanks. I think that's worth to try making use of it - but I'll better add some assertion: hence if it would ever break, at least I know what the reason is instead of silent irreproducible data corruption :) Martin _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
