On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > Maybe we can do this asynchronously?
Yep. A per-port statemachine with transitions triggered by both the hub INT-IN urb and some timers sounds like a good idea to me. > I want correctness over performance, so this patch is good for now and I > think is probably the best thing for 2.4. > > But I think we may be able to do better for 2.5. Unless we would like to get full PM support into 2.4 - I doubt the existing hub.c could be extended this way without major headaches. Martin _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
