On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:55:19PM -0800, Steve Calfee wrote: > > If I remember correctly, Win98 did a quick 100 ms attempt and if it failed > then retried reset using a longer delay. Win98 did lots of retries, maybe > infinite, probably to get around problem devices. I dont have a catc right > now, so maybe someone else could verify this. The advantage of this > technique is that the normal, healthy devices get enumerated quickly.
This would be a "better" way. But until someone sends me a patch that does that, I'll take this one. Martin, I'll add your patch to my trees, thanks. greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
