On Thu, Apr 18, 2002, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's because of this ill conceived code: > > You want to shoot the messenger, rather than > paying attention to the message ... > > It seems clear to me that there were at least > a few other things going wrong. Fixing them > would prevent the BUG(). Correctly written > drivers won't ever see that failure mode.
That's wrong. There are no bugs in the current code. If you change it back to the 2.4 style of reference counting, I guarantee that there are no races. The BUG() only occurs because the reference counting was changed, but not all of the drivers were changes to use the new method. But since the change wasn't fixing a bug in itself in the first place, it's catching false negatives now. JE _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
