On Tue, May 21, 2002, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm gonna speak for Bluetooth USB devices. > I do have bunch of things like Kodak digi camera, Sony DV camcorder, CF > reader, etc. But they don't > seem to care much about which HCD is used and work equally well with both > usb-uhci and uhci drivers. > > I used to be a uhci driver fan :). But starting somewhere from 2.4.16 or so > Bluetooth devices work much better > with usb-uhci driver (not all devices but most of them). Even thought > Bluetooth is pretty slow (about 700kbps) > performance difference is sometimes pretty significant 20-30% (ie usb-uhci > driver is faster). > > So basically I vote for usb-uhci. However some things will have to be > fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple > of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest > usb-uhci though).
Please test the latest version of the drivers. Both uhci and usb-uhci have had various bug fixes. I'm sure the performance problems you've had with uhci have been fixed for a little while now. Also, feedback about the -hcd variants would useful too since one of those will be the only ones left for 2.5. JE _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
