On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:41:39PM -0700, Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy wrote: > Greg, > > I'm gonna speak for Bluetooth USB devices. > I do have bunch of things like Kodak digi camera, Sony DV camcorder, CF > reader, etc. But they don't > seem to care much about which HCD is used and work equally well with both > usb-uhci and uhci drivers. > > I used to be a uhci driver fan :). But starting somewhere from 2.4.16 or so > Bluetooth devices work much better > with usb-uhci driver (not all devices but most of them). Even thought > Bluetooth is pretty slow (about 700kbps) > performance difference is sometimes pretty significant 20-30% (ie usb-uhci > driver is faster). > > So basically I vote for usb-uhci. However some things will have to be > fixed. We (Bluetooth folks) have couple > of devices that refuse to work with usb-uhci (I didn't test the latest > usb-uhci though).
Sorry for the confusion, but both usb-uhci.c and uhci.c will be deleted anyway :) I am more interested in usb-uhci-hcd.c and uhci-hcd.c drivers, which both showed up in 2.5.16. Yes they are based on the previous usb-uhci.c and uhci.c drivers respectivly, but they are a bit different (they use the hcd core code which reduces the size of the driver.) You also might want to check out uhci.c again in 2.4.19-pre. It has had a lot of previous bugs fixed and works _much_ better for me than before. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
