Uz.ytkownik David Brownell napisa?: >> open-host-contoller-interface-host-controller-[driver]... >> >> Quite a lot of semanticla duplication if you ask me. > > > If you split all acronyms into their component atoms > before coming up with new names, I think you'll end > up changing quite a lot of technology nomenclature. > (Avoid starting names with 'g' for GNU ... ) > > Eliminating everything that could be implied would give > USB "open.o", "universal.o", and "enhanced.o" ... I'm > not sure such generic names would be a good idea! :) > > >> [ re why the changes ... ] >> Yes yes I see and I second the changes. >> But I still have some "esthetical" problems with the >> new naming conventions. > > > I'm not religious about them, but so far your own > suggestions would further confusion since they end > up reusing existing names ... if "ohci" becomes one > driver name, then its peer new-style "uhci" version > would get confused with one of the old-style drivers. > > Using that "-hcd" suffix is completely unambiguous. > (But if we go with the "usb-uhci-hcd" driver I'd vote > to rename it as "uhci-hcd".)
I didn't kown ohci was already used. But if anything I would prefer the usb- prefix over the -hcd suffix and a move away of the old driver which occupied this name before. > > - Dave > > > > > > -- - phone: +49 214 8656 283 - job: eVision-Ventures AG, LEV .de (MY OPINIONS ARE MY OWN!) - langs: de_DE.ISO8859-1, en_US, pl_PL.ISO8859-2, last ressort: ru_RU.KOI8-R _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
