On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:40:50PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Hrm... okay, what's the best BK way to handle this? Do I generate a new
> changeset to fix this, or go back into an older tree and generate a
> different solution/changeset?
Best way is to probably do the following:
- resync with my tree by pulling from linuxusb.bkbits.net/usb-2.5
- make your changes and check them in.
- generate a patch comparing your tree, with what is in my tree:
bk export -tpatch -r1.566..+ -h > ../patch-to-send-to-greg
the 1.566 in the above line might not be the correct changeset
to diff against. Look for the place where you merged your
tree into mine and use that one. You should be able to tell
by the resulting diff if you got the correct one or not.
Let me know if you have any problem with this.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
