On Tue, May 28, 2002, Stephan Feder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > > Ok, now that 2.5.16 is out, we have a total of 4 different USB UHCI > > controller drivers in the kernel! That's about 3 too many for me :) > ... > > 1. I tried uhci-hcd and usb-uhci-hcd with linux-2.5.18 and in both cases > I get "usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout" while reading from my scanner > (using the scanner module). Same with every kernel I tested from 2.4.0 > up to 2.4.18 with uhci and usb-uhci. Reported on this list last august. > > 2. usb-uhci-hcd is up to 10% faster than uhci-hcd. This is critical for > me because I cannot have the scan process stop every other scanline > (hardware is cheap but not that cheap).
What hardware is this again? All of the tests that I have run have shown the opposite, but I haven't ever tested a scanner. This may be the excuse I've been looking for to buy a scanner :) > Because of 2. I would prefer usb-uhci-hcd but the most important thing > is to have _only one_ uhci driver (whichever one you choose). JE _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
