Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let me (and the linux-usb-devel list) know about any thoughts you have
> pertaining to liking one of the drivers over the other one. Speed
> tests, size tests, code pretty tests, comment spelling tests,
> documentation tests, you name it, I want to know about it. If you
> don't want your comments to be public, send them to me directly and I
> will not let anyone else know what you said, but will use the info to
> try to pick which one should stay.
I did a simple test reading a bunch of files from a Freecom CDRW
drive.
usb-uhci-hcd 17840 0 (unused)
pengo:/cdrw$ time wc petero/mp3/madonna/*
...
188462 1091976 50386286 total
real 1m24.930s
user 0m10.440s
sys 0m1.360s
uhci-hcd 24608 0 (unused)
pengo:/cdrw$ time wc petero/mp3/madonna/*
...
188462 1091976 50386286 total
real 1m33.095s
user 0m12.670s
sys 0m11.870s
So the usb-uhci-hcd driver is 27% smaller, gives a 10% higher transfer
rate and produces less system load during the data transfers. (About
70% idle time versus 50% idle time on my 233MHz MMX system.)
--
Peter Osterlund - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
