Well, the patch for #3 is about 6 lines long... 

The patch for #2 is really the major part of what I sent....

The patch for #1 was removing some #if 0 code while I was doing #2.

So I guess I could have split it, but I did it all at one sitting in just a
few minutes, so it seemed a bit more apropriate to keep it all as one.  If
you'd like, I'll make the effort to move to smaller patches.

Matt

On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:42:27AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:43:51PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > Here's a patch which does three things:
> > 
> > (1) It removes some dead code.
> > (2) It moves more code to using the new state machine
> > (3) It fixes a long standing bug relating to the sense data for a detached
> > device.
> > 
> > Greg, please apply.
> 
> Applied.
> 
> One comment, since your patch did 3 things, why not 3 patches?  Or would
> it have been to edit the patch by hand into 3 pieces (i.e. they were
> intertwined)?  Not a big deal, just curious.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> _______________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
> August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

NYET! The evil stops here!
                                        -- Pitr
User Friendly, 6/22/1998

Attachment: msg06890/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to