On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:39:22AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Well, the patch for #3 is about 6 lines long... > > The patch for #2 is really the major part of what I sent.... > > The patch for #1 was removing some #if 0 code while I was doing #2. > > So I guess I could have split it, but I did it all at one sitting in just a > few minutes, so it seemed a bit more apropriate to keep it all as one. If > you'd like, I'll make the effort to move to smaller patches.
If you think it's worth it, feel free to. If not (as this one was proven not to), then don't. If I feel anyone is trying to send too big of a change to me I'll push back and ask for it to be split up. With the advent of the main bk kernel tree, it makes it easier if there are problems for people to pick and choose different patches to remove to try to track them down. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
