Christopher Hoover wrote: > This version doesn't oops and is perspicuous. > > I haved tested it in the "both strings" case (which made the old code > oops) and in the "no strings" case.
What was the problem with the old code though? That was tested in all four cases ... was it just that you had a device with extra-long strings? - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
