On Thursday 19 September 2002 09:48, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 09:37:07AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:55, Greg KH wrote: > > > Sorry, but I'm not going to put the file back. I understand your > > > concerns. We should have some kind of program (lsdev like) that shows > > > the system information present at that moment in time. It will be able > > > to provide what the /proc/bus/usb/drivers file showed in the past. > > > > How about calling it /proc/bus/usb/drivers? > > Please go back and read what I wrote above what you snipped out and then > explain how this would be possible.
I don't get it. What's the problem? Not that I'm advocating that proc have functionality that can be done perfectly well in user space, but I fail to see why you couldn't do it in proc if you wanted to. -- Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
