-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 06:42, David Brownell wrote: > >>I wasn't joking about putting back the /proc/bus/usb/drivers file. This > >> is really going to hurt us in 2.6. > > Considering that the main use of that file that I know about was > implicit (usbfs is available if its files are present, another > assumption broken in 2.5), I'm not sure I feel any pain... :-) OK. Everytime someone goes "I've got usbfs loaded, and here is /proc/bus/usb/devices, but can't send you /proc/bus/usb/drivers", I'll assume that you two will answer the question.
Helping people is hard. Please don't make it harder. :-( Brad - -- http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9i63BW6pHgIdAuOMRAmylAKCFgC9OMHhzzLT9ac+Z+YHSNkn0IACeJsCe MxFG9+07RZh1QnDAE27/FqI= =vwfj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
