On Sat, Sep 21, 2002, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 06:42, David Brownell wrote: > > >>I wasn't joking about putting back the /proc/bus/usb/drivers file. This > > >> is really going to hurt us in 2.6. > > > > Considering that the main use of that file that I know about was > > implicit (usbfs is available if its files are present, another > > assumption broken in 2.5), I'm not sure I feel any pain... :-) > > OK. Everytime someone goes "I've got usbfs loaded, and here is > /proc/bus/usb/devices, but can't send you /proc/bus/usb/drivers", I'll assume > that you two will answer the question. > > Helping people is hard. Please don't make it harder. :-(
Personally, I've never used /proc/bus/usb/drivers. I've always just looked at lsmod. Why should this be any different? JE ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
