On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Joe Burks wrote: > I'd hope for keeping just one version in the kernel, otherwise the > companies making distros are going to have a terrible time with > it... There are a couple important things my driver does that John's > doesn't, but there is one very important thing that John's driver did that > mine doesn't: asynchronous frame grabs.
Sounds like we're in agreement here on both counts. > If John has the inclination, a patch to my 2.5.41 driver to do asynchronous > streaming rather than synchronous streaming would be a great boon to whole > community. Like I said, I'd rather try to merge my stuff into the sourceforge version (now in-kernel) than try to compete with it. Unfortunately, I'm too lazy to diff against anything other than an official kernel version, so it'll have to wait till Linus puts out a version with the updated vicam driver. That is, unless these kind of changes run up agains the Oct. 20 deadline... I'll need some clarification there. John ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
