On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, David Brownell wrote:
>The tricky bit is that the usb_{claim,release}_bandwidth() calls work
>on urbs, not endpoints. So I think those calls need to vanish, and
>HCDs need to switch to more precise math.
After reading that I realized my patch doesn't pass the BW reservation to
the next queued interrupt URB...oops!
Since there's that bug, and the big patch I sent should be smaller
patches, would you guys like me to re-send the patch, but with that change
and more seperated into smaller patches? (After I update my pine mailer,
of course ;)
--
Dan Streetman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------
186,272 miles per second:
It isn't just a good idea, it's the law!
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
