On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:40:43AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Ick, no, I will not take this patch, sorry. That's just too much data > > on the stack. Try using skb_clone() or friends if you need a temp copy > > of the skb. > > Hi Greg, I guess I didn't make it clear that this was a temporary measure > until I rewrite atmsar_decode_rawcell.
Heh, yes I saw that in your patch, but I couldn't accept it as is, even for a short while, sorry. > I will rewrite atmsar_decode_rawcell > now then and resubmit without the copy on the stack, ok? Sounds fine, thanks for doing this. And if you want to rediff those other patches that I couldn't apply, feel free to, they looked fine. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
