Hi,

On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:03:50AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> This patch prints the vendor + product ids of the scanner after it has
> been successfully detected.
> 
> Also the annoying error message about "Scanner device is already open"
> was downgraded to a dbg. Scanning for devices while one scanner device
> was open produced several 100 error messages in syslog.

Thanks for applying all the other patches.

Is there a reason why you didn't apply this one (for 2.4 + 2.5)?

Also you seem to have applied the maintainer change (scanner.h +
scanner.c) only for 2.4 and not for 2.5? 

While I'm talking about scanner.h: Is the separated include file for
the ioctls also necessary in 2.5?

What about the fix for crashes when someone writes to a disconnected
scanner? Are there fundamental problems with the patch or should I
just resend it?

Bye,
  Henning


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to