On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:03:50AM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > This patch prints the vendor + product ids of the scanner after it has > > been successfully detected. > > > > Also the annoying error message about "Scanner device is already open" > > was downgraded to a dbg. Scanning for devices while one scanner device > > was open produced several 100 error messages in syslog. > > Thanks for applying all the other patches. > > Is there a reason why you didn't apply this one (for 2.4 + 2.5)?
I was behind in patches, sorry. > Also you seem to have applied the maintainer change (scanner.h + > scanner.c) only for 2.4 and not for 2.5? > > While I'm talking about scanner.h: Is the separated include file for > the ioctls also necessary in 2.5? I don't think so, you will be deleting the scanner driver in 2.5 soon, right? :) > What about the fix for crashes when someone writes to a disconnected > scanner? Are there fundamental problems with the patch or should I > just resend it? I don't know, I didn't like the patch the last time I saw it. How about a 2.5 version first? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
