David Brownell wrote:
>
> > ********** REQUEST ***********
> > Would it be possible for someone to add the controller info to the debug
> > messages, in the proper way.
> > I just stuck in what I needed, without any thought as to format.
> > ******************************
>
> The 2.5 driver should be better, though I've got some diagnostics
> patches pending there. I'll likely submit them before too long,
> more or less at the time I post a backport of that newer OHCI code
> to the latest 2.4 kernel.
I saw that, much better.
>
> Yes, now that most new PC hardware has multiple USB 1.1 controllers,
> that old "there's only one" assumption is troublesome.
>
> > Some of the error codes, -75 EOVERFLOW, I can' find in any of the source I'm
>running.
> > I'm probably blind!
>
> See the cc_to_error[] in usb-ohci.h, which is where all the
> hardware error codes get translated (from <linux/usb.h> USB_ST_*
> codes, finally gone in 2.5).
>
Found it, thanks.
> > I've seen this failure on both hardware.
> >
> > <3>usb-ohci.c: OHCI Unrecoverable Error, controller usb-00:12.1 disabled
> > <7>usb-ohci.c: OHCI controller usb-00:12.1 state
>
> If you want to track this down further, the first thing I'd suggest is
> trying to reproduce it on the 2.5 "ohci-hcd" driver. Since you're only
> accessing it from user mode (with usbfs) that should be easy to do.
> (Make sure you have the latest "module-init-tools".)
>
I failed to say that 2.5.60, does the same thing.
I do try 2.5.xx when the changelog shows something interesting.
I'll try it again with 2.5.61.
> - Dave
>
--
Gary A. Gorgen | "From ideas to PRODUCTS"
| Tunxis Design Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 10470 Pineville Ave. Cupertino, Ca. 95014
| Phone: (408) 973-1542
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
