On Wednesday 26 February 2003 23:59, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for
> > debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility
> > to show this, like under windows?).  We no longer consult the usb_device
> > struct in udsl_atm_proc_read, so don't take a reference to it.  Against
> > Greg's current 2.5 USB tree.
>
> Hm, this doesn't apply:
>       patching file drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c
>       Hunk #2 FAILED at 699.
>       Hunk #3 succeeded at 715 (offset -6 lines).
>       Hunk #5 succeeded at 886 (offset -6 lines).
>       Hunk #7 succeeded at 996 (offset -6 lines).
>       Hunk #8 succeeded at 1161 (offset -1 lines).
>       1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c.rej
>
> Want to re-diff?

Looks like something bad happened when you merged with Linus on Feb 24:

http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/usb-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A couple of lines in udsl_atm_dev_close vanished...  but why?

I will rediff.

Duncan.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to