On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2003 23:59, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:58:51AM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Output the correct device name, show the state of the device (for > > > debugging) and of the ADSL line (anyone want to write a graphical utility > > > to show this, like under windows?). We no longer consult the usb_device > > > struct in udsl_atm_proc_read, so don't take a reference to it. Against > > > Greg's current 2.5 USB tree. > > > > Hm, this doesn't apply: > > patching file drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 699. > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 715 (offset -6 lines). > > Hunk #5 succeeded at 886 (offset -6 lines). > > Hunk #7 succeeded at 996 (offset -6 lines). > > Hunk #8 succeeded at 1161 (offset -1 lines). > > 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > drivers/usb/misc/speedtouch.c.rej > > > > Want to re-diff? > > Looks like something bad happened when you merged with Linus on Feb 24: > > http://linuxusb.bkbits.net:8080/usb-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A couple of lines in udsl_atm_dev_close vanished... but why?
Ugh, my merge there was messy, that's my fault, sorry. I'll go clean up the merge and see if your patch applies then. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
