On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:48:03AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> >>The crash doesn't happen if I move back the irq unlink from
> >>destroy_scanner to disconnect_scanner:
> >
> >
> >Which points at the ohci driver not allowing usb_unlink_urb() to be
> >called after the device is disconnected.  David, is this true?
> 
> Certainly.  disconnect() is in charge of doing such unlinks.

But we shouldn't oops if unlink() is called after disconnect(), right?

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to