Hi, On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:35:38AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:48:03AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > > >>The crash doesn't happen if I move back the irq unlink from > > >>destroy_scanner to disconnect_scanner: > > > > > > > > >Which points at the ohci driver not allowing usb_unlink_urb() to be > > >called after the device is disconnected. David, is this true? > > > > Certainly. disconnect() is in charge of doing such unlinks. > > But we shouldn't oops if unlink() is called after disconnect(), right?
Just to make this more clear: the oops doesn't happen when we unlink in destroy_scanner but somewhere in ohci which expects that unlink is already called. bye, Henning ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
