Hi, On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:14:54PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > I think it's probably okay to apply this patch. More testing would be > good, but I don't have any suitable hardware. And I think a > software-loopback sort of test wouldn't address many of my changes very > well.
Just a quick test: I used a Mustek ScanExpress 1200CU USB scanner with usb-skeleton: T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=03 Cnt=01 Dev#= 3 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=055f ProdID=0001 Rev= 1.00 C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=40 MxPwr= 64mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none) E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 2 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=1ms Only the bulk endpoints are used for communication. I can scan just as with the USB scanner driver. No problems. I tried to crash the driver by open/disconnect/write sequences but hadn't any luck in doing so. I couldn't find any problems at least with my device. hth, Henning ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
