On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Greg KH wrote:

> Ok, I've update my tree to the -bk level, and it's at:
>       bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/usb/usb-2.5-bk
> 
> Let me know if anyone has any problems with it, that aren't related to
> the -bk level of the kernel :)

Greg:

There are so many different trees floating around, I can hardly keep them 
straight.  Apart from the one you mentioned above, there's Linus's 
linux-2.5 and Marcelo's linux-2.4 on linux.bkbits.net, and there's your 
usb-2.4 and usb-2.5 on linuxusb.bkbits.net.  Not to mention the files 
available at kernel.org.  My own repository is cloned from usb-2.5, is 
that the appropriate one?  (And how do _you_ keep them straight? :-)

Also, I don't understand the nomenclature used for these kernels.  What's 
the difference between 2.5.70 and 2.5.70-bk1, for example, and how do I 
tell which one I've got?  The EXTRAVERSION setting in Makefile doesn't 
contain anything.

Thanks,

Alan Stern



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to