On Friday 04 July 2003 10:30, Duncan Sands wrote: > > One other option may be to add a list to the QH structure and use that > > if the URB needs a QH. If there are any TDs linked to the URB priv list > > head, we free them when we destroy the URB priv. If they are linked to > > the QH list head, we free them when we destroy the QH. > > > > That would be really easy to do. > > > > I'll have to double check the code to make sure it would work. > > Hi Johannes, did you come to any conclusion? If it seems OK I will start > coding it up this weekend.
OK - I implemented this is in a quick and nasty way, and it works. (Though maybe I just changed the timing enough to not hit the race anymore...) It looks like Alan's analysis was right on target :) I'll try to send a clean fix next weekend. Duncan. PS: I managed to get the same process error without queueing urbs - it just took a lot longer. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
