Hi!
> >>- APM uses the pm_*() calls for a vetoable check,
> >> never issues SAVE_STATE, then goes POWER_DOWN.
> >
> >
> >I remember the reason... SAVE_STATE expects user processes to be
> >stopped, which is not the case in APM. Perhaps that is easy to fix
> >these days...
>
> That SAVE_STATE restriction doesn't seem to be documented...
It is not; but I could not convince myself that it is okay to call
SAVE_STATE with userland alive, and that's why I did not add
SAVE_STATE to apm.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
