On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:23, David Brownell wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > >> - APM uses the pm_*() calls for a vetoable check, > >> never issues SAVE_STATE, then goes POWER_DOWN. > > > > > > I remember the reason... SAVE_STATE expects user processes to be > > stopped, which is not the case in APM. Perhaps that is easy to fix > > these days... > > Pavel > > > That SAVE_STATE restriction doesn't seem to be documented...
Because it is plain wrong ;) Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
