On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:52:20PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > usually this would be too trivial, but is so obviously stupid that > people might think that there's some hidden trick in there. > > We should not check for NULL _after_ following a pointer. > Consider it a small tiny step towards cleaning up this code.
Applied, thanks. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
