On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:53:03 -0500 (EST)
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/usb.c Mon Jan 12 00:27:37 2004
> > @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@
> > int usb_control_msg(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned int pipe, __u8 request, __u8
> > requesttype,
> > __u16 value, __u16 index, void *data, __u16 size, int timeout)
> > {
> > - struct usb_ctrlrequest *dr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + struct usb_ctrlrequest *dr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest), GFP_NOIO);
> > int ret;
> > @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@
> > if (result < 0)
> > return result;
> >
> > - buffer = kmalloc(sizeof(status), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + buffer = kmalloc(sizeof(status), GFP_NOIO);
> > if (!buffer) {
> Note that these changes have essentially already been incorporated into
> 2.6, so only 2.4 needs updating.
Fine by me, too.
I am wondering though if it might make sense to have these things externally
allocated, that is, make outside requestors pass usb and usb_ctrlrequest
as arguments.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
