On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:23:00AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg, is there some reason I should know about why this patch hasn't been > accepted yet?
It's still in my TODO queue, sorry. Due to the holidays, my recent family growth, and the type of patches Linus has been accepting lately, I've been a bit behind on applying USB patches. I'm trying to catch up on everything that does not modify the USB core (almost finished with that). I'll send those to Linus when he returns from .au, as these types of changes are a lot easier for me to test, and are lower risk. Then I'll take the time to go over all of the core USB patches that people have been sending me recently (David send a bunch for example, along with yours.) I'll have to test those changes a lot more carefully, with all of the different USB devices I have around here (which is a lot.) I want to make changes to the USB core slowly, now that we are in a stable kernel series. So, sorry for the delay, we just need to be a lot more careful at this point in the kernel development cycle. Does this sound acceptable? greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
