On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:23:00AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Greg, is there some reason I should know about why this patch hasn't been > > accepted yet? > > It's still in my TODO queue, sorry. Due to the holidays, my recent > family growth, and the type of patches Linus has been accepting lately, > I've been a bit behind on applying USB patches. > > I'm trying to catch up on everything that does not modify the USB core > (almost finished with that). I'll send those to Linus when he returns > from .au, as these types of changes are a lot easier for me to test, and > are lower risk. Then I'll take the time to go over all of the core USB > patches that people have been sending me recently (David send a bunch > for example, along with yours.) I'll have to test those changes a lot > more carefully, with all of the different USB devices I have around > here (which is a lot.) I want to make changes to the USB core slowly, > now that we are in a stable kernel series. > > So, sorry for the delay, we just need to be a lot more careful at this > point in the kernel development cycle. > > Does this sound acceptable?
That's fine. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some real problem with the patch that I had missed seeing. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
