On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:44:41AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 31. M�rz 2004 22:42 schrieb Matthew Dharm: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:17:04AM +0100, Richard Curnow wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Mar, 2004 at 12:22pm, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > > > I've seen some buggy devices act this way. > > > > > > > > They can't handle the control requests interspersed between > > > > usb-storage transaction requests. It's a spec violation. > > > > > > So any platform/version combinations where it appears to work are just > > > likely to be luck, then? > > > > That would be my theory. > > What would you propose to do? Grab dev->serialize in both code > paths?
To be honest, I don't have a proposal.
We've talked about this before on the mailing lists... we've never come up
with a good solution.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
It was a new hope.
-- Dust Puppy
User Friendly, 12/25/1998
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
