Am Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 02:46 schrieb Matthew Dharm:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:44:41AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 31. März 2004 22:42 schrieb Matthew Dharm:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:17:04AM +0100, Richard Curnow wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 29 Mar, 2004 at 12:22pm, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > > > > I've seen some buggy devices act this way.
> > > > >
> > > > > They can't handle the control requests interspersed between
> > > > > usb-storage transaction requests. It's a spec violation.
> > > >
> > > > So any platform/version combinations where it appears to work are
> > > > just likely to be luck, then?
> > >
> > > That would be my theory.
> >
> > What would you propose to do? Grab dev->serialize in both code
> > paths?
>
> To be honest, I don't have a proposal.
>
> We've talked about this before on the mailing lists... we've never come up
> with a good solution.
It seems to me that the problem screams for a semaphore. The question is
just which semaphore.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
